Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Big-Bang George Lemaitre and his studies Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 21:01:55 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <429b8191-14c8-4b08-9efc-88306d168b9f@googlegroups.com> <797cac4e-83ff-42d7-94c5-14df8958f976@googlegroups.com> <627be46d-9261-4411-ba17-83e77d8d4c05@googlegroups.com> <134bde62-8c52-4978-8ae9-09194c824ac7@googlegroups.com> <6bb4c393-7152-4e8d-801f-1d7a5f3f6031@googlegroups.com> <213be9d6-03aa-4aec-9111-18969878479c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net qh+OarWCU9Pf2ej+44lrLAiQ+O1Q2sjnllpyjJ0PcBgy56mFTG Cancel-Lock: sha1:ARpmtVY4zzl9coHheYbbhWJuU9Q= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 In-Reply-To: <213be9d6-03aa-4aec-9111-18969878479c@googlegroups.com> Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:458311 Am 17.05.2018 um 22:24 schrieb Edward Prochak: >>> Continuing the pseudo-science of insult in innuendo. >> >> Well, I had no intention of insult. Actually I was trying to challenge >> his invention 'big-bang theory' by questioning his personal integrity. > > Hardly a method of scientific research. Well, that's in fact true. But can you imagine, how many times my own personal integrity was questioned, with the aim to discredit my ideas? TH