Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Digital Light Signals Prove Einstein Wrong.
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:11:14 +1100
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <ebp4v2Fcea9U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <o2pf56$vtf$2@gioia.aioe.org> <ebbkneF4qn6U1@mid.individual.net> <7a18e604-e4ae-4841-b8ec-3ca03a885255@googlegroups.com> <ebcofvFcl8uU1@mid.individual.net> <o2sra7$8mm$1@pcls7.std.com> <3ef8c7d9-fadb-4a92-9fa7-de1569cd9e39@googlegroups.com> <o2tpv1$1jcq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o2u9e7$jkt$1@news.albasani.net> <o2v33i$1ums$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o30n1t$h2g$1@news.albasani.net> <o31oi8$419$1@gioia.aioe.org> <3ebba501-88a1-4368-8f42-be694ba5bcd6@googlegroups.com> <o33o9s$ffe$2@pcls7.std.com> <o34bcn$1ssi$1@gioia.aioe.org> <DqWdnTds2LHNI8jFnZ2dnUU7_8z8fwAA@giganews.com> <o34h1v$5qs$2@gioia.aioe.org> <l5idneRaxNvBbsjFnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <o352db$qhk$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ebmk8lFogi3U1@mid.individual.net> <o35k28$1e8g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net HPxJ17UISejb0BOa/TGUHgOwTEoiOdn0mvmw3ClJUTCtysDcrK
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lst7QMaOJoqs0rLuEz3b4zp0R2U=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To: <o35k28$1e8g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:402243

On 18/12/2016 8:14 PM, HGW wrote:

>
> Look, if the teeth or a saw are moved over a bit of metal, the metal
> vibrates. The faster it is moved, the higher the frequency of that
> vibration. The saw teeth do not oscillate. They simply MOVE...and so
> does a radio signal.
>
>
>> Sylvia.
>
>
OK, so taking light as a wave moving through space, with frequency being 
just the rate at which the waves pass a particular observer, relate that 
back to your original claim, that if Einstein's second postulate were 
correct, no digital technology would work.

Sylvia.