Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The relationship G and g
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:19:46 +1100
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <e9psf2F5926U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <1cd49d6f-776b-454c-a2b5-7bba87067f57@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net eEaiupaVfzlwqwjPOr/vQQ00KSSEn4z+/TOZicG/sJsbI3Y1zg
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9BivhBASwybkyLAhkVyujv8ByFY=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To: <1cd49d6f-776b-454c-a2b5-7bba87067f57@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:399661

On 20/11/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> The relationship G and g
>
> Can GR explain the relationship of G to g? Relationship or causes, not definition!
>

Theories do not explain. They describe. GR does the describing very well.

Sylvia.