Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Particle physics Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:16:22 +1000 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <8bd1aa31-f10a-485f-8fbd-07dcdb63a99c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net iF6WLNJ2lEirTcMGxtHLpAuxc+b6pGOYzZOyHFbrZG6gXAxF++ Cancel-Lock: sha1:nXK5jnEANDNIvBGCbo/3bhoXng0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:393171 On 11/09/2016 10:53 AM, numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: > Are you saying that the bubble chamber particle physics is invalid? > Essential a glass window produces the same problem since a particle > beam composed of matter, will produce a hole in the glass or shatter > the glass window. You have a flawed notion about particle penetration because you're extrapolating from your everyday experience of classical objects. When a particle passes unchanged through matter, it does so because it has not interacted with the matter. So there's no hole created. Sylvia.