Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 18:57:56 +1000 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <650d891e-426d-448e-967c-c2c34c9cb29e@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ZRVisR1ExQeXq9u9eIgIDwQMajaloMkQ/+eWxLRnIGPMVMYC3o Cancel-Lock: sha1:LJrGofqZTW6rYMbgi/YJ+JvkGUI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:387026 On 1/07/2016 5:21 PM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu piątek, 1 lipca 2016 09:13:03 UTC+2 użytkownik Sylvia Else napisał: >> On 1/07/2016 4:44 PM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: >>> W dniu piątek, 1 lipca 2016 06:49:52 UTC+2 użytkownik Sylvia Else napisał: >>> >>>> To the relatively moving observers, the clocks on the rod are not >>>> synchronised. >>> >>> And, of course, an observer going through a street >>> will notice trees and lanterns running around him. >>> >> Oh, you want to dive down that tunnel again, do you? >> > > No. I'm just pointing the obvious fact that relativistic > tales of observers had nothing in common with reality > even in Galileo's time. > Observers are simply too complicated for You and Your > theories. > No, you're just restarting your bizarre straw-man attack on relativity. Sylvia