Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:50:45 +1100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <di2sqlF7665U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <62e3b0e6-b556-4a74-abb3-011c916bf297@googlegroups.com> <dhnbhbF9mofU1@mid.individual.net> <n96t09$vp1$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <n96ve8$2n2$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <dhopb6Fk1qdU1@mid.individual.net> <n97cks$d0u$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <dhqds7F2k96U1@mid.individual.net> <n9aies$jbt$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <dhspsoFlfjrU1@mid.individual.net> <3181219c-3931-43e2-8d32-0f83859092e3@googlegroups.com> <dhu2pcFanpU1@mid.individual.net> <8f0a6ea4-45e1-49d0-9a38-e1e5468ed2fe@googlegroups.com> <di032dFftflU1@mid.individual.net> <ed49e556-9613-494a-942a-dc58f698c5d1@googlegroups.com> <di08ffFh5gkU1@mid.individual.net> <54e67e5a-4bec-4251-8600-a669bc97a383@googlegroups.com> <di0md1FkkllU1@mid.individual.net> <4e510738-d50a-4ba8-b33d-2b9e860dd637@googlegroups.com> <6c88f850-f4be-4951-bc60-87b9b0917b0e@googlegroups.com> <aac87288-6adf-4321-8e26-91ecd411a111@googlegroups.com> <di2adbF35adU1@mid.individual.net> <2e909a82-a840-405c-80f4-612e6619c2f0@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Qvbj/rjQthJ92ZZjILzX7wqio+/dv+p6/A7FaI4f8qy6W/xPSv
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bOdIprHKzVc06gn3OunDA4ZthmQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To: <2e909a82-a840-405c-80f4-612e6619c2f0@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:376011

On 11/02/2016 5:56 PM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu czwartek, 11 lutego 2016 03:36:31 UTC+1 użytkownik Sylvia Else napisał:
>> On 11/02/2016 1:27 AM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, they are. And the numbers on their displays are equal,
>>> with the precision of the acceptable error, i.e. t'=t,
>>> against your insane Shit claiming accurate clocks should
>>> indicate its insane time dilation.
>>>
>>
>> Why are you so convinced of this? Have you tried it?
>
> Have I tried what?
> I'm convinced, that clocks indications are equal,
> because it's written in any documentation, and
> almost everyone here confirms.
>

They're the same when the clocks are next to each other and not moving 
relative to each other.

I challenge you to produce documentation that says they the same 
regardless of circumstances.

Sylvia.