Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Faster than the speed of light Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:40:25 +1100 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <2a4a52fc-3b33-40c3-bf79-5dff5eabf9bb@googlegroups.com> <13ad159d-8927-480c-957d-8654c91ad4a3@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 4bj3XKHFgbpRM8cgnhG/ywsJv832/d15z4g6VNfHdNJEjO9LbJ Cancel-Lock: sha1:TqchxriF04icyrATfxL+Q/HjAnY= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:371205 On 1/12/2015 3:55 AM, Carl Heinz Krüger wrote: > суббота., Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:40:48 -0800 пользователь Ross A. Finlayson > написал: > >>> Not so. It's about everywhere you have a field. Ie gravity, >>> electrostatic etc. All action at distance. >> >> The idea is that there's a mechanism, "spooky" is Einstein's name for >> "non-causal information propagated at greater than c", with the idea >> that "entanglement" >> may have tachyonic structure, with gravity being "faster" than c, but >> where no thing moves that fast so information does not. > > The archaic dogma that information must travel at c or slower is abolished > nowadays. Since information transfer does not always requires a carrier or > a medium. > >> The correlation of particles (as structurally some "wave") >> over extended distances is not the same as a "laser beam at 2c". > > There are correlations in time and correlations is space, as well as > autocorrelations. A correlation in space is time independent for instance. > Hence, it might be embedded into the system at the start of the experiment. But Bell's theorem proves that it's not in the case of quantum entanglement. Sylvia.