Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:19:49 +0200 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <163e902e-31be-43a7-9bdd-23da1737fab4@googlegroups.com> <49a0ddd3-dfc7-4445-a79e-377b53d0ecb4@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net AJ1PkDiSEbvivQ2dHVFhLQs8xib1nazNER/+XBrNLcIFv4aLu1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+v5PwevP+vTZ7VnriOdtwLIhKuo= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:364043 Am 13.09.2015 22:05, schrieb kefischer: .. >> This is a mutual relation, since the harbour 'sinks behind the (event-) >> horizon' for an observer on a moving ship, while the ship does similar >> for an observer in the harbour. >> >> Sinking behind the event horizon may actually look dramatic and >> unpleasant, but the people on the ship think similar about you and your >> planet. >> >> TH > > The captain of the Bismark said, "I don't sink so". > > (I didn't know that you are captain of a ghost ship.) Well, if you don't like my explanation of 'black holes', than maybe you should write, what exactly you don't like and why. It is obviously a mutual relation and we see something remote vanishing in a black hole, this remote object would see us (Planet Earth) doing the same. This is very similar to the horizon and the 'disappearing' ships behind. From this we could see the 'relativity' of space and time. This - btw- is mentioned in the name of this forum (which is called 'sci.physics.relativity'). TH