Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:45:21 +0200
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <d5jdmoF9c29U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <msudvg$bg$1@speranza.aioe.org> <163e902e-31be-43a7-9bdd-23da1737fab4@googlegroups.com> <msujev$ccc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net d4GsWXUfEOo7R8gqEBLwdwmqzSy6p+imVwqQN+D5QFNcupW9Kd
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJKPHfWpJy39wCjEE1RBKEcUxbE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <msujev$ccc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:363914 sci.physics:520528

Am 11.09.2015 15:03, schrieb Lleyton H. Bellucci:
> Il giorno Fri, 11 Sep 2015 05:56:26 -0700  *_fuller.david_* ha scritto:
>
>>> While in Relativity Tensors are something Inconceivable IMMATERIAL,
>>> defined /assumed floating in empty space, "spacetime" or wherever, in
>>> Divergent Matter Tensors are pretty much WELL posed literally MATERIAL.
>>>
>>> Of course they are embedded in the Matter which is Expanding. In numbers
>>> this gives a score of
>>>
>>> Relativity 0 Divergent Matter 2
>>> Have a nice weekend.
>>
>> It is simple matter is an amount of entropy, that entropy is increasing.
>
> Wow, this must give
>
> Relativity 0
> Divergent Matter 3
>
> I really appreciate.

Actually I think, that GR is true and there is a physical entity called 
'spacetime'. This we observe from the inside, because we are a part of 
that entity, like anything else.

I explain matter as 'structures' of spacetime (like a wave is a part of 
the ocean). This matter is 'relative' (to the specific FoR, from where 
we observe).

So matter is not matter in all other FoR, but could vanish, if that is 
chosen in a certain way. This is a mutual relation, where one object is 
shrinking in one FoR, while expanding in another FoR.

Once it's too small to see, it will 'drop behind the event horizon' - 
where it remains unchanged.

Our observation is then like a 'comoving cut'. This is as if we are 
moving in time (along the axis of time). This axis defines a 'time 
domain', where we are using the same kind of clocks. (Within this domain 
matter stays matter.)

The surface of the Earth is not the only possible place. It is only 
difficult to leave (for us as common human beings). But we could imagine 
to be in another location and observe the world from there.

 From such a FoR the view would be like our view upon the universe. But 
we would see a different 'universe' there, since in a different FoR we 
have also a different way to measure time and a different order of 
causal relations.

TH