Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: Are there electrons that are different? Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:06:44 +1000 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Ws8e/YIbYoE1r7WBoevCfwzEz76sdg5/rZIwIyfGD9o6NJ/Zye Cancel-Lock: sha1:nyMU0mK9CoX5v5LQhgtaZr4jv5s= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:361598 sci.physics:515994 On 23/08/2015 6:28 AM, James Birdy wrote: > Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking > barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically, > the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are > getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in > old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which > might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers) > Even had it been the case that electrons got taken up by bare feet (a highly improbable scenario), they would have migrated to the surface of the skin [*], which consists of dead tissue. Apart from repelling the odd blood-sucking insect that had happened to have acquired a negative charge, it's hard to see what benefit could have accrued. Sylvia. [*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed on its surface because of electric repulsion.