Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,alt.usage.english,rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Super Intelligence Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:59:17 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 53 Message-ID: <6AC6A495.6BD8@ix.netcom.com> References: <6ABC6FC3.4B51@ix.netcom.com> <119igcu$1no7$1@dont-email.me> <119ihno$28sd$1@dont-email.me> <119p5hf$pve$1@moist.bananacorp.nl.uucp> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 19:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="3355929"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fqXwbyYJb57l3t/aUnCyoH4wve2upaxU="; posting-host="43491eb346fab23c4ebcb2b969937e63" Cancel-Lock: sha1:uVJMpCVUM2YluQNmfoeEqoS6+fk= sha256:jdlDMjbFnPJnzcUIAdJT6AxGo60HvmR2fbC4Q8CimBc= sha1:wZ3jagmU2+CPJpUNOoUmpUdjVOY= sha256:pbLqBLx5BK0+BxUxajaSIPUTH+h+8ZG3W5dZE2wcEB8= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 261007-4, 10/07/2026), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:674239 alt.usage.english:1151946 rec.arts.tv:1859012 Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > > On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: > > On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: > >> occam writes: > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it > >> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good? > > > > It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around. > > > > > > If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2. > > "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work > > in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial > > intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex > > structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological > > processes." > > > > The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic > > coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos; > > made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc. > > > > The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational. > > The reason why most journalist like to criticize AI is because they > > feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only > > better, quicker and cheaper. > > So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I > go about that in the first place? For example???? you wanna make a baby with an Ai? > -- > Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ > I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com > https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; > Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.