Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: What are perfect clocks Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 20:18:50 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 91 Message-ID: <6AC5BA1A.38AA@ix.netcom.com> References: <18db594c631dcc72$98574$908382$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC29A0D.7F7D@ix.netcom.com> <18db682fb376c852$96762$900885$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC2B0BD.2D8B@ix.netcom.com> <18db8993fd7aa85e$121486$867271$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC3E09F.67B9@ix.netcom.com> <18dbd77976fd6a01$124898$867271$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC483EF.227A@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 03:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="2646206"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/i7NjAb5mQRpEa73XRN/3FPeqH9DMc8Cs="; posting-host="43491eb346fab23c4ebcb2b969937e63" Cancel-Lock: sha1:FylwtLWi/SQszono3iH2H809E0Y= sha256:Jz6I6uW3CfvnhIAxfd4cfVwv6yg/Q1NJHVg1F1/ikig= sha1:4J3bn5iVlE4E/EATCEWnj8KeGyY= sha256:t2MAKfrRjk0iUdWoaJKhtfKS30+6mLSGBZfyUwjZZew= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 261006-10, 10/06/2026), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:674217 The Starmaker wrote: > > =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote: > > > > On 10/5/2026 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote: > > >> > > >> On 10/4/2026 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On 10/4/2026 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> A perfect clock would be the universal clock. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Perfect is relative. Fir The Shit > > >>>> woeshipers perfect clocks are the clocks > > >>>> fitting their idiocies, of cours (and, > > >>>> apart of that - measuring what they measure, > > >>>> as their definition states). > > >>>> > > >>>> For sane people perfect clocks are > > >>>> synchronized clocks (that's not a > > >>>> definition, but a necessary condition). > > >>>> > > >>>> So were they for pre-einsteinian > > >>>> physicists - seems they were mostly > > >>>> sane, even with this mystical mumbo > > >>>> jumbo their moronic religion is adding > > >>>> to everything it can't comprehend. > > >>> > > >>> I was refering to Newton's clock: > > >>> > > >>> It continues ticking along, as a perfect machine, with its gears > > >>> governed by the laws of physics, > > >> > > >> Mystical magic, as expected from a physicist. > > > > > > i didn't know Newton's motion of the planets was...Mystical. > > > > Oh, planet motion is simple enough even for a > > physicist. > > But - how do we know something is perfect - > > is not quantum physics, it's complicated. > > > > > > > > > > It's not complicated. It's simple. > > She goes into the house > and the soup is too hot > and the other soup is too cold.. > and then she say, "This one is Perfect!" > > "Just right" means that something is completely suitable, correct, or > precisely as it should be without needing any changes > > Synonyms > • Perfect > > https://www.google.com/search?q=define+just+right > > It's quantumn, and it's simple. > > It's a Goldilocks Universe. Let me explain what that means... for example: if gravity were slightly stronger, stars would burn too hot... if it were ever so slightly weaker, earth could not hold on to it's atmosphere. The earth is perfect! https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=the+goldilocks+universe -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.