Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Hachel's blunder Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:05:01 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 193 Message-ID: <6AB236AD.176C@ix.netcom.com> References: <6AAEE5BE.4FC6@ix.netcom.com> <6AAF80BB.3583@ix.netcom.com> <6AB02453.4105@ix.netcom.com> <6AB16CD2.D3B@ix.netcom.com> <6AB1A888.B46@ix.netcom.com> <6AB1FD3B.1EA6@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="711110"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+dWe+9FJkCxjY9s0MSyY014JWhhK9mZQQ="; posting-host="9d8dd633d27e2aa0d49f1aab68d4c111" Cancel-Lock: sha1:+2UuhYBWWh0LTym3+iZC3QHoPzY= sha256:aFKln7Y/fbOlVEVDKoMvIWXxaCSu88aSt8axPuN2gb8= sha1:l0EpB1BkpfmPCuwkN/x/fLFp5Pc= sha256:O580Tzh18Gi03MtRQLLdBWwi6d2AlTvN5ZEmiwr5HmA= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260921-4, 09/21/2026), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:673543 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hachel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I always said there was something amiss with this business of relativistic > > > > > > > integration, where physicists calculate the proper time of an accelerating > > > > > > > rocket relative to the Earth's reference frame. > > > > > > > It seemed to me that the approximation was correct—that one could indeed > > > > > > > set dt = d(tau)/sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} locally. > > > > > > > And that the problem lay in the integration itself. > > > > > > > But actually, no. It is the equation that is flawed. It is a beautiful > > > > > > > equation, certainly. But wrong. Completely wrong. > > > > > > > I had started from a personal error—assuming dTo^2 = dTr^2 + d€t^2 > > > > > > > —but that is incorrect. Just as the Minkowski metric, which leads to > > > > > > > dt^2 = d(tau)² + d€² is completely wrong. > > > > > > > The advice and research provided by Python—who believed that if there > > > > > > > was an error, it couldn't stem from the integration but rather from the > > > > > > > formula itself—proved extremely useful. > > > > > > > So, we arrive at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ..and not to what physicists say—who make the same blunder I did (in > > > > > > > fact, you cannot position yourself at point O and then move to the > > > > > > > x-coordinate Tr1 to use an equation that is valid only when starting from > > > > > > > O). > > > > > > > That was the source of my error, just as the physicists' error stems from > > > > > > > their belief in Minkowski geometry—which works only for simple Galilean > > > > > > > reference frames where velocity remains trivially constant. > > > > > > > It fails to work for rotating or uniformly accelerated reference frames. > > > > > > > It is truly alarming to realize that the *entire* doctrine must be > > > > > > > scrapped, and everything rebuilt and re-explained from scratch—starting > > > > > > > with a clear definition of relativistic simultaneity, a concept physicists > > > > > > > mistakenly conflate with chronotropy without understanding the first thing > > > > > > > about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > R.H. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Ce message a été posté avec Nemo : > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll explain since I'm the only genuieses in da room.. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a clock.. > > > > > > it is a giant clock... > > > > > > a very big gigantic clock, > > > > > > > > > > > > and the time is... > > > > > > > > > > > > it's NOW everywhere!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > What time is it now? > > > > > > > > > > > > The Time is ... NOW everywhere!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > What time is it now? > > > > > > > > > > > > Now? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > it's NOW everywhere!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > it's always now. > > > > > > > > > > > > What time is it now? > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't you just ask me dat? > > > > > > > > > > > > IT'S NOW!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, i beg to differ..not according to Einstein's clock. > > > > > > > > > > > > FUCK EINSTEIN'S CLOCK!!!! > > > > > > > > > > In other words, if you want > > > > > "a clear definition of relativistic simultaneity" > > > > > > > > > > it's FUCK EINSTEIN'S CLOCK! > > > > > > > > > > There is only one universal clock, and that clock reads the time is NOW > > > > > everywere. > > > > > > > > Let me put it this way. The Universe HAS a Master Clock. > > > > > > > > Our solar system is part of this universal clock mechanism. > > > > > > > > Our solar system is part of this clock... > > > > > > > > the wheels of mercury turn faster than the wheels of earth and so on... > > > > > > > > buy a sundial. > > > > > > > > It's going to be 12: o'clock...dats when the sun is 12 o'cluck > > > > high...high up there...straight up. > > > > > > > > Einstein's clocks are for people who travel through ...Amtrack. > > > > > > > > Newton has a Master Universal Clock. > > > > > > > > Einstein has a cuckoo clock. > > > > > > > > The problem Einstein had is how do you schronize two cuckoo birds???? > > > > > > > > He would have patent it if he knew how... > > > > > > > > so you are stuck forever wit dis imperfect cuckoo clock. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as PERFECT on earth. > > > > > > > > You need to understand the 'machinery' behind the Universal Master > > > > Clock... > > > > > > > > and that machine is located OUTSIDE your egg shaped universe. > > > > > > > > Here is what the machine outside the universe looks like... > > > > > > > > (beyond the dark matter which surronds your universe) > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com./watch?tvv=IkCku4TM8HA > > > > > > Keep in mind Einstein was jealous of anything having to do with Newton. > > > > > > Einstein's goal was to bury Newton. > > > > > > (Newton's IQ was HIGHER than Einstein's IQ) > > > > > > GR was created to bury Newton. > > > > > > Does Einstein believe in a Master Universal Clock??? > > > > > > Einstein only believes in ...his cuckoo clocks. > > > > > > Has Einstein ever said anything nice about...Newton???? > > > > > > Newton said gravity is a force..and Einstein sez gravity is not a force. > > > > Now, a closer examination of Gravity according to Einstein is that > > Gravity is caused by > > the curvature of space. > > > > That isn't true. > > > > Space is not curved. > > > > Space does not have straight or curve lines. > > > > An egg is curve, but the yoke in the egg is not curved. > > > > Our universe is contained/enclosed in a curve shell. Space runs through > > in and out of this enclosure. > > > > Gravity runs through in and out of this enclosure. > > > > Gravity according to Newton is a force. > > > > If a planet is round it's not because of the curvature of space...but, > > but of gravity's force. > > > > Dark Matter is the stage in which our enclosed universe sit's on. > > > > Evrybody who is standing upside down on the other side of the earth is > > not > > caused by the curvature of space...it's an upside down stage. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > How did the apple hit Newton's head if it should have 'curved' pass his > head??? > Les not forget Newton still lives beyond relativity. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.