Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The experiment that sinks both SR and LET Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:52:09 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 116 Message-ID: <6A9710C9.9FC@ix.netcom.com> References: <18cce6a61ba9f85f$182140$566809$4246dc13@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <116rfii$24vji$1@dont-email.me> <1s0js2x.4khlwa1cndwvzN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <18d07ecc497b874c$134871$874455$4296dcc3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1s0ni54.1gecx3koj77xmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <18d0d4e7df9981d9$136053$874455$4296dcc3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1s0pfpm.1bsohin1wje1hkN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <18d12dc3ce42ed4f$333$1510481$4246dc13@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1s0rgtw.1pdtt4k1myax7vN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="2160522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LBAwEX/8HOZiBmrTpoKU8KxsDXV1MeN0="; posting-host="888ceac37a08eb555b2e9623f6285c57" Cancel-Lock: sha1:fotFmT1EO+MyVQ0pvleOYWlCmMc= sha256:Vv9PbSd5+94nt4ypom5lVqb1Pd9WpqHWvGpJYLqT3+k= sha1:NJXgmU6z0wHzWlwc4CsDm6TP2Ro= sha256:UaUVy0kbCWcE10oDRlrJ7jej/3E0LwxEp1oho47ujtk= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260901-4, 09/01/2026), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:672633 Python wrote: > > Le 01/09/2026 à 16:28, Ross Finlayson a écrit : > > On 09/01/2026 05:30 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> HenryWilson wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:36:19 +0200, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>> > >>>> HenryWilson wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 11:06:05 +0200, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I know of many thousands of such cases.but you wil have to buy my book > >>>>> to learn about them. It will be available very soon. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe you should go to Stockholm first to collect your prize, and use > >>>> the money to distribute your works of genius for free. > >>> > >>> Nah! I don't want to be associated with a bunch of charlatans > >> > >> God luck with that. > >> > >>>>>> It also get many things completely wrongc...like the whole of > >>>>>>> Astronomy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sure, merely correct to about ten decimal places, for orbits in the > >>>>>> solar system, > >>>>> > >>>>> Correct according to constant light speed. So no objects are quite > >>>>> where Astronomers think they are. > >>>> > >>>> Like the Huygens probe landed on Titan for example? > >>> > >>> ...and two Mars probes crashing...an asteroid landing in Russia instead of > >>> missing the Earth altogether and numerous other examples of constant > >>> light speed failing.. > >> > >> Shit happens. > >> However, all succesful navigation through the solar system > >> is based on using general relativistic coordinate systems, > >> in particular TCB, and using transponders on spacecraft, > >> reckoning with constant speed of light, [1] > >> > >> You haven't shown that you can do better, > >> > >> Jan > >> > >> [1] Tracking of the Cassini spacecraft confirms general relativity > >> (and hence constant speed of light) at the 10^-5 level. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > The Pioneer Anomaly is explained variously, with regards > > to the speed of light in the geocentric, the heliocentric, > > and overall the "polaricentric". > > > > The dead-reckoning is a well-known difficult problem. > > > > The modern account of redshift-bias/distortion and that > > since "Dark Energy" and "2MASS" for example, combined > > with the overall isotropy of what was and is the visible > > universe, make for that "light's speed is a constant, ..., > > in deep space, ..., in a vacuum, ... at absolute zero", > > that "deep space" is arbitrarily deep. I.e., there's plenty > > of data that has falsified the often premier theories, then has > > that a simple sort of experiment makes for distinguishing > > space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational, > > since "E = mc^2" is "only good to the first/second-order". > > > > So, redshift-distortion/bias, is a rather modern sort of > > account that intends to make for why light's speed is a > > constant, yet that it enters and exits rotational settings > > as if tidally, then helping explain many effects of optics, > > about which more local explanations fail, in a wider, > > overall potentialistic setting, that the potential-fields > > are the real-fields, and for accounts like "physics is a > > gauge theory" and so on. > > > > It's a continuum mechanics. > > The Cassini result is explained variously, with regards > to the geocentric, heliocentric, and overall > paragraphocentric. > > Redshift-bias/distortion makes for the constant being > non-constant in precisely the constant way required by > the potentialistic real-fields, except to second order, > where E=mc^2 becomes rotationally linear. > > This follows from continuum gauge mechanics and the > Bäcklund-Ricci-Regge correspondence, in the usual sense > that none of those words need to be connected by an > equation. > > It's a discontinuum mechanics. technobabble! is dis from a classic Star Trek episode??? Let me put on my Harvard PHD hat in Physics and disect it... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.