Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:49:02 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <64E5577E.4859@ix.netcom.com> References: <908740bc-efe1-4790-8623-328401d8cba6n@googlegroups.com> <97309717-e8d4-48e0-8a1e-913267fd5915n@googlegroups.com> <66eb1570-bc52-4316-bcc2-e2f3fccc93ffn@googlegroups.com> <3aac5dcb-5962-49b1-bdd4-8963aafa58e7n@googlegroups.com> <64E45CA2.764C@ix.netcom.com> <64E53485.5839@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="550856"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:PxFa5rzqILyxvAYj2jkQDDr5uzKQ14VUK1RktgybWA8= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230821-0, 08/20/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:618598 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:41:43 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > On 8/21/2023 5:05 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 9:36:04 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > > > > > >> And again, after 100+ years, there is NO such scientific observations or > > > > >> experimental evidence discovered. None. > > > > > > > > > Please explain which twin is predicted to be time dilated when both are moving relative to the other and time dilation is caused by relative motion. > > > > And again, you don't understand the twin paradox. Time dilation as > > > > described in the 1905 paper only applies to inertial motion. And you can > > > > apply it to the PORTIONS of the journey where one twin moves at a > > > > constant speed relative to the other. However the turnaround > > > > event/acceleration causes all of the effects which causes the traveling > > > > twin to age less. It is NOT symmetrical. > > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by inertial motion. How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > > > What time does time dilate? October, 1971???? > > > > How amny clocks does it take to measure Time dilation??? you're gonna > need a lot of clocks, and then point to the one dat looks like it > worked. > > maybe the other clock... > > Truth is, Time dilation has never been proven my any experiment that > wasn't a fraud. > > Only fraud experiments prove Time dilation. > > Might as well put a thousand clocks on a plane going in one direction... > > one of those clocks gotta work. > might as well put all the clocks in one of those 'collidiers', and throw in the kitchen sink. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.