Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:19:49 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <64E53485.5839@ix.netcom.com> References: <908740bc-efe1-4790-8623-328401d8cba6n@googlegroups.com> <97309717-e8d4-48e0-8a1e-913267fd5915n@googlegroups.com> <66eb1570-bc52-4316-bcc2-e2f3fccc93ffn@googlegroups.com> <3aac5dcb-5962-49b1-bdd4-8963aafa58e7n@googlegroups.com> <64E45CA2.764C@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="527882"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:ZZjM8gQXU4aN7QQyN+uLGefQImBGLAV78jid8OFzlg8= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230821-0, 08/20/2023), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:618589 The Starmaker wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:41:43 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > On 8/21/2023 5:05 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 9:36:04 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > > > >> And again, after 100+ years, there is NO such scientific observations or > > > >> experimental evidence discovered. None. > > > > > > > Please explain which twin is predicted to be time dilated when both are moving relative to the other and time dilation is caused by relative motion. > > > And again, you don't understand the twin paradox. Time dilation as > > > described in the 1905 paper only applies to inertial motion. And you can > > > apply it to the PORTIONS of the journey where one twin moves at a > > > constant speed relative to the other. However the turnaround > > > event/acceleration causes all of the effects which causes the traveling > > > twin to age less. It is NOT symmetrical. > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by inertial motion. How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > What time does time dilate? October, 1971???? > How amny clocks does it take to measure Time dilation??? you're gonna need a lot of clocks, and then point to the one dat looks like it worked. maybe the other clock... Truth is, Time dilation has never been proven my any experiment that wasn't a fraud. Only fraud experiments prove Time dilation. Might as well put a thousand clocks on a plane going in one direction... one of those clocks gotta work. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.