Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Subject: Re: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:23:09 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <64BB59AD.726@ix.netcom.com> References: <64B96B99.5660@ix.netcom.com> <64BB4F6D.4C98@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3945018"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:Spa/5don2jcrKLTtx5UG7aPV3xXxwL29ni82j0iGvk4= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230721-10, 07/21/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:615874 sci.physics:877889 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:2678836 The Starmaker wrote: > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote: > > > News • University > > > Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers > > > Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says > > > https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/ > > > > > > investigation found “manipulation of research data.” > > > > > > "The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.” > > > It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and > > > marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).” > > > > > > "For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of > > > manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering) > > > > > > ""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to > > > have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in > > > the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money) > > > > > > "...contain doctored imagery..." > > > > > > https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/ > > > > > > > > > https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein > > > > > > > He never said that. > > > > Sylvia. > > Are you saying it is not characteristic of Albert Einstein to say: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' > > or do you attributed it to someone else? Who then if not Albert Einsten???? > > The name "Sylvia Else" sounds like it contain a doctored imagery...Does "Else' mean someone Else? Or are you a Usenet Trans...from guy to girl?? or something else... > > Stanford's president Marc Tessier-Lavigne is still a FRAUD. A crook. > > The fact is...The Hebrew University of Jerusalem associated that quote to Albert Einstein. Are they wrong? (and they published it in a book associating that exact quote to Albert Einstein: > > 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' Now, since this is being posted also to a politics newsgroup, I'll add a little politics... Nancy Pelosi has a daughter who wrote a book called: Campaign Boot Camp 2.0: Basic Training for Candidates, by Christine Pelosi where she uses Albert Einstein's quote to...How To brainwash the voters. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.