Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Twin paradox article in Wikipedia Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:48:37 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <64B17C65.607C@ix.netcom.com> References: <986ea74c-b237-4f7b-a8f5-3f66e736cb29n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="2075794"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:e6gZXb4I4enknCm/+S+7PP3HxyEQPkPdTuuWnGeCzus= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230714-4, 07/14/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:615267 Mike Fontenot wrote: > > Each twin, when they are NOT accelerating, must conclude that the other > twin is aging more slowly. Yet they each agree that the home twin (she) > is older at their reunion. The only way that can be true is that the > traveling twin (he) must conclude that she instantaneously ages by a > large amount during his instantaneous turnaround. "instantaneous turnaround."???? is dat even possible? don't you need to slow down come to a complete stop stop refuel then turn around -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.