Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:59:01 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <64A70EF5.237@ix.netcom.com> References: <611da058-8231-48ba-853d-5f5f60a0cea2n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3148039"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:sg7lVpPhAXjBM4PNXMF+JRQcE8HoX/Rk3lsJRLkx2fc= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230706-6, 07/06/2023), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614570 Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > A long-distance shot by a sniper (shooting from a train) must take into account wind. If the trajectory of the bullet shows the lack of any wind, it does not show the bullet does not share the velocity of the source. It does not show the bullet velocity is independent of the source. It does not confirm the constancy or invariance of the bullet's speed. It still shares the velocity of the source. Therefore, the MMX did not prove the constancy of the speed of light. the sniper needs to be in a vacumm there is no wind...in a vacumm. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.