X-Received: by 10.31.167.197 with SMTP id q188mr15141830vke.26.1483638163501; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:42:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.48.39 with SMTP id d36mr3852544otc.1.1483638163456; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:42:43 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w39no3943qtw.0!news-out.google.com!g131ni9618itg.0!nntp.google.com!b123no624514itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:42:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0e754291-96b1-470a-a49c-d0858e565767@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.101.11.188; posting-account=Hy9ItAoAAAAglm1JyPibPXKZWfMlXKal NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.101.11.188 References: <5648f84e-5335-4e4a-adf5-703899be7414@googlegroups.com> <18dfbe5b-e754-437f-ada1-b41d12ae7b39@googlegroups.com> <3da7a516-b570-43e7-a941-42456ff09429@googlegroups.com> <8d5f2f83-c74c-4bfe-9858-0a819a6d87c6@googlegroups.com> <9c6dbb8e-b36e-41ee-8ba6-6baca627409b@googlegroups.com> <444cc151-1997-4f30-8cc0-7ff0c74d085b@googlegroups.com> <05c8603c-0364-455a-a7e5-242f405ef6f1@googlegroups.com> <04cf2eef-db5d-49ad-b2b5-2adf7cf41bf8@googlegroups.com> <2e07ee02-e42e-4397-a2da-ec8093a013dc@googlegroups.com> <092cc8be-25ec-44e4-a180-4934cb5afe35@googlegroups.com> <0e754291-96b1-470a-a49c-d0858e565767@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <613fd962-e255-4c8f-9389-f2fb9a9da170@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Lying sack of shit, Robert Winn From: Robert Winn Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:42:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lines: 61 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:404151 On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 9:10:37 AM UTC-7, Dono, wrote: > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 7:43:03 AM UTC-8, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 8:06:50 AM UTC-7, Dono, wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 9:28:04 PM UTC-8, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 9:23:21 PM UTC-7, Dono, wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 8:19:05 PM UTC-8, Robert Winn wr= ote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 6:57:12 PM UTC-7, Dono, wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-8, Robert Win= n wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 5:19:02 PM UTC-7, Dono, wr= ote: > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:43:12 PM UTC-8, Robert= Winn wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But the Galilean transformation equations will not work= unless t'=3Dt. So if we have two clock with different rates, then we have= to use two sets of Galilean transformation equation with different variabl= es for time and velocity in each set. =20 > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > Imbecile > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > The fact that the Galileo transforms do NOT work has been= known since 1850. CRETIN. INCURABLE. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Oh, well, then you would have no objection to posting the r= eason the Galilean transformation equations were found to be wrong in 1850. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > CRETIN > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Because Maxwell equations aew not invariant with respect to t= he Galilei transforms. This is how it was found that Galilei transforms are= wrong. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > I would certainly be interested in see why scientists thou= ght the Galilean transformation equations were wrong in 1850. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Now you know. Go fuck yourself. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statem= ent. > > > > >=20 > > > > > CRETIN. INCURABLE. > > > >=20 > > > > I am not the one using profanity. So which of Maxwell's equations = do you think proved the Galilean transformation equations wrong? > > >=20 > > > Here, imbecile: > > >=20 > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations#Vacuum_equations.2C= _electromagnetic_waves_and_speed_of_light > >=20 > > Well, there is no doubt you are a scientist. You never answer a questi= on. >=20 > Lying sack of shit. Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement. I am t= elling you the truth.