Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: estimate of the age of the universe
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 11:21:47 -0800
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID: <5C02DF4B.43F8@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="5604"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 181201-6, 12/01/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:503550 sci.physics:715968 sci.physics.relativity:478705 alt.astronomy:302334

I just realized that
how 'they' measure the
age of the universe is
done incorrectly.

1) by looking for the oldest star


I don't see how they can look for the
oldest star since stars existed trillions
of years before the big bang.

2) and back to the big bang


measuring stars from a
big bang is not how you measure
the universe since stars existed Before
the big bang.



I mean like WOW, you people got everything wrong, haven't you?