Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Time Dilation as I understand it
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2018 14:49:43 -0700
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID: <5B959577.222F@ix.netcom.com>
References: <e8e8c6c9-5eaa-4c6d-a5ef-796a2998cafc@googlegroups.com> <AoydnUVaDKbJvwnGnZ2dnUU7_81j4p2d@giganews.com> <0ea2198d-d124-4d14-a8b1-fd4e89f62075@googlegroups.com> <pn1bm8$bvg$3@pcls7.std.com> <3bd8db69-3a15-4f97-b823-5ca3703528f2@googlegroups.com> <pn1gnl$l42$1@pcls7.std.com> <728fbe18-d063-4819-b55d-c864de965e23@googlegroups.com> <5B956A90.34F1@ix.netcom.com> <0d33fec2-d4d6-49d6-bb34-508cecedf971@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="46165"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180909-4, 09/09/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:471199

Ed Lake wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, September 9, 2018 at 1:46:42 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Time Dilation is not steady...
> >
> > in other words, time dilales every so often..not every second.
> >
> > So, ...if you're perfoming an experiment...like with clocks...
> >
> > you have to wait...for...Time...to....dilate.
> >
> >
> > If Time is not dilating
> > while
> > perfoming a
> > Time Dilation
> > experiment...
> > nothing happens.
> >
> > So, your
> > Time Dilation
> > experiments
> > are wrong..
> > if you're not taking
> > into account
> > Time Dilation
> > not...dilating.
> >
> >
> > But yous people fail to understand this...
> >
> > I'm astounded.
> 
> I think you have a belief about Time Dilation that is different from the understandings held by everyone else in the world.
> 
> If you have an atomic clock atop a mountain and another at the bottom of the mountain, the clock at the top of the mountain will ALWAYS tick just a bit faster than the one at the bottom.
> 
> Or as the NIST stated it, "For example, if two identical clocks are separated vertically by 1 km near the surface of Earth, the higher clock emits about three more second-ticks than the lower one in a million years."
> 
> In other words, after a million years have passed, the higher clock will show that 3 more seconds have passed than the lower clock will show.
> 
> There is no waiting involved.
> 
> Ed


"a million years"????