Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 14:25:42 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 50 Message-ID: <5998ACD6.DF5@ix.netcom.com> References: <59987B7D.5CAE@ix.netcom.com> <927f141e-a977-4d76-b6ba-8b40d279ddd5@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170819-0, 08/18/2017), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:429482 Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > > On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 11:23:44 AM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 19.08.2017 um 19:55 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > The Other Side of a Black Hole > > > > > > > > > it appears that yous people > > > have no idea what lies, or > > > what it looks like at > > > The Other Side of a Black Hole. > > > > > > > > > Maybe yous are not allowed to think that far yet... > > > > > > > The 'other side of a black hole' is -of course- a 'big bang'. > > > > > > That is obvious, if you extend the axis of time through the black hole. > > > > Then (on the other side) what vanishes into nowhere pops out of nowhere. > > That is a black hole time reverted. > > > > > > TH > > I was in the other thread explaining my idea > about the spherical nature of a black hole in > terms of formation (as from the initial black > hole formation), then about the boundary conditions > of the event horizon then the layers as basically > build the black hole in its own well of time. > > This has the other side of the black-hole as > for example the anti-matter (and even anti- > space) universe. > > This is where, there's not much so organized > within it at all. > > One imagines transport quite different, if > perhaps in the same "terms", on the one and > the "other side" of the black hole. > > Again this usually has the black hole consuming > the matter as entirely disintegrating it and > as by the forces of gravity or into the well. do you realize how absurd you sound?