Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 20:20:14 -0500 Message-ID: <596184D0.92A@ix.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 18:20:16 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The correct explanation for the twin paradox References: <086f7a5d-bd46-44dc-abf3-98488917a499@googlegroups.com> <595FB442.376D@ix.netcom.com> <26ea4b57-9ad8-40fd-964e-105d9598fe4b@googlegroups.com> <596034C0.3F7A@ix.netcom.com> <5961241A.2991@ix.netcom.com> <9b05902c-7d28-4366-8ef1-670686544437@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170707-0, 07/07/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 42 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-8PIAPynWWjAzIfRcRNq1n8SjGC4C4uVHMPvpvNDVGsd5nQFiujXwD/oGUcApvCyC0do3VQyDNKjs3Bk!W0YJabOl7VNOYhVrTIzrnsow58prGV42Dt/n2qpZbhxwtRIFrrjTt3if/bGLq9sq7IETFYF5k1C6!7Yvfrb3gMA== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3482 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:424316 kenseto wrote: > > On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 2:27:42 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > > kenseto wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 9:25:56 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > kenseto wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 12:18:20 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > kenseto wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > During B’s entire journey B’s clock accumulates clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma than A. At no time B observe A’s clock accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate than B’s clock. Why? Because B’s clock second contains a larger amount of time (absolute time) than A’s clock second. IOW, a clock second is NOT A UNIVERSAL INTERVAL OF ABSOLUTE TIME in different frames. It contains a different amount of absolute time in different frames. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This explanation is confirmed by the GPS. A GPS second is redefined to have 4.4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. This is designed to make the passage of a redefined GPS second corresponds to the passage of a stand ground clock second and thus making the GPS permanently in synch with the ground clock in terms of absolute time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if time would to stop for 5 minutes universally, would anyone be aware > > > > > > of it? > > > > > > > > > > There is no way to stop the passage of absolute time. You can stop the passage of clock time by damaging the clock but the passage of absolute time continues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if time can start, it can stop.. > > > > > > Yes.....clock time can start and stop. But not absolute time. > > > > > > > > it can even slow down, or speed up. > > > > > > Similarly clock time can slow down or speed up but not absolute time. > > > > > > > > ...and time can turnaround and go back. > > No.....absolute time moves in one direction....it can only move forward into the future. > > > > > > (and i ain't talkin bout clocks) there is no future for time to 'move into'.