Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why there must be an absolute frame - New Book
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 12:04:29 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <59612CBD.2061@ix.netcom.com>
References: <d66198bf-5642-443b-8654-16df31cee6d7@googlegroups.com> <ojqhqm$tb1$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170707-0, 07/07/2017), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:424296

Poutnik wrote:
> 
> Dne 08/07/2017 v 14:05 Edgar L. Owen napsal(a):
> > Relativity is well known for saying that all frames are equally valid and there is no absolute frame but this is demonstrably false.
> 
> It is remarkable that several errors occur even in the first sentence.



It's not perisqiitive.