Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The correct explanation for the twin paradox
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:18:10 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <595FB442.376D@ix.netcom.com>
References: <086f7a5d-bd46-44dc-abf3-98488917a499@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170707-0, 07/07/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:424192

kenseto wrote:
> 
> During B’s entire journey B’s clock accumulates clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma than A. At no time B observe A’s clock accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate than B’s clock. Why? Because B’s clock second contains a larger amount of time (absolute time) than A’s clock second. IOW, a clock second is NOT A UNIVERSAL INTERVAL OF ABSOLUTE TIME in different frames. It contains a different amount of absolute time in different frames.
> 
> This explanation is confirmed by the GPS. A GPS second is redefined to have 4.4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. This is designed to make the passage of a redefined GPS second corresponds to the passage of a stand ground clock second and thus making the GPS permanently in synch with the ground clock in terms of absolute time.


if time would to stop for 5 minutes universally, would anyone be aware
of it?