Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 14:59:03 -0500 Message-ID: <590CD996.69E9@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 12:59:18 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: My paper about Einstein's Second Postulate References: <290b824e-462f-47f3-948a-086158af675a@googlegroups.com> <590C2169.3868@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170505-4, 05/05/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 45 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-qLqtYzydTRx/4E8k7J21BIA9CmADKJFjmeTuva7+lmlL/qbMMReRwrYGt6MDh1FzDbTD+09qxgDBLT4!mOm85VxXCSW/UYCfoDpaMfKbIZw+ocqJdvfdDttJSUCBT/dhefSPi4KLIQCoHDg3b2YivVvWk9Sf!oFSEsTXtK2E= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3222 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:418276 Ed Lake wrote: > > On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 1:53:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > In case anyone is interested, arXiv.org decided to reject my paper titled "An Analysis of Einstein’s Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity." They provided no reason, other than to indicate there was something wrong with it, but they weren't "referees" and didn't have the time or inclination to explain their actions. > > > > > > So, I submitted the new version to viXra.org, where it was immediately accepted and is now available for reading at this link: http://vixra.org/abs/1704.02 > > > > > > It is VERY different from the first version, in that it includes references to the "Sagnac Effect" and to the "Michelson-Gale Experiment," which readers of the first version told me needed to be added. > > > > > > I'd appreciate any thoughts about this new version. To me, it leaves no doubt that "Einstein's Emitter Only Theory" is correct and the "mathematicians' all observers theory" is DEAD WRONG, even though it is what is taught is most colleges and universities. > > > > > > I'd also be interested in thoughts about what journals might publish it. I haven't given up on that. > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > Any journal will publish it at the right price...and everybody has a > > price. > > > > The trick is to know the numgber of the right price so you don't over > > pay by a penny. > > > > > > Name a journal. > > arXiv.org is NOT a journal. It is a web site run by Cornell University where - in theory - people can put their papers to have them discussed by the "scientific community" before publication. Cornell also runs viXra.org, where I put my paper: > > Ed I didn't say arXiv.org was a journal... you wrote: "I'd also be interested in thoughts about what journals might publish it." The answer is...any journal! You give them money, they'll publish it! Name a journal.