Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:43:36 -0500 Message-ID: <59023BDA.FF@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:43:38 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: The Speed of Thought References: <58FBA2D2.5616@ix.netcom.com> <58FE2B13.6D93@ix.netcom.com> <58ffbd0a$0$60157$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> <58ffde50$0$28927$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170427-0, 04/27/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 31 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-3HExFEfyfj9f1NqsalWBp7HsaOcJxIt6yD5+EnBjmprbExoaCsVZ5YJh/3wrKebEGRFmjFQln+m0syl!lZQBpQMVX4MtAHC4TGUuX6zB+YsY3/WiadnzMlcHe6cr+/pCld1uHUrFpBwsggf5aWoe2c+BHpE5!7iEvV1Mk X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2686 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:630917 sci.physics.relativity:417436 rec.arts.sf.written:469940 Ned Latham wrote: > > benj wrote: > > Ned Latham wrote: > > > benj wrote: > > > > > > ----snip---- > > > > > > > You need to think about this a bit more, sylvia. While obviously the > > > > transmission speed of "thoughts" in organism is slow as determined by > > > > action potential timing and other factors. But that does not consider > > > > the OTHER question which would be given an ESP "remote viewing" is the > > > > speed of transmission of information limited by the speed of light. > > > > There are a number of indications and reports that might seem to > > > > indicate it is not, but there are additional problems in that there > > > > seems to be a certain looseness to time which could mean that > > > > transmissions are at c but you are sensing the future so there is the > > > > appearance of FTL transmissions. This is real science thought unlike all > > > > the religious atheist clowns here who are all convinced that thoughts > > > > occur ONLY within the brain cells. Feh. > > > > > > Rubbish. > > > > Obvious science jargon. > > It translates into the English term "rubbish". "rubbish" is not English...it is Englandish. spoon in the mouth talk, the language of a banana republic.