Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Slow clock transport and the measurement of one way light speed. Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:37:44 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 44 Message-ID: <57AE3398.A96@ix.netcom.com> References: <528e47e6-bd5b-4777-b689-e1f06bfe8d5c@googlegroups.com> <872f8d71-1ea4-497b-887b-f39dd1434167@googlegroups.com> <6d86b881-11bb-42c2-bbb7-c50cf4b9570c@googlegroups.com> <57AE2906.F28@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:389875 Virgil wrote: > > In article <57AE2906.F28@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker wrote: > > > rotchm wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 8:52:55 PM UTC-4, HGW. wrote: > > > > > > > Clocks synched together are absolutely synched. Move them apart any way > > > > you like and they remain in absolute synch. > > > > > > Why do you lie so? You know darn well that there are *direct* experimental > > > verification that show that when you bring a clock to "over there" and > > > bring it back, > > > it will NOT show the same value on the clock that remained. > > > > > > > > > Okay, I understand it does not show the same values... > > > > > > but what are the values, what are the numbers... > > > > > > if the values are not the same, ... > > > > > > when did the change occur? > > Unless there is a universal time, which there isn't, > "when" has no single answer. > -- > Virgil > "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller) I don't get it.. what is the point of having an atomic clock if you don't know what time it is? Did anybody check the clock to see when it happen???