Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:32:35 -0500 Message-ID: <5751BF46.59AB@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:32:54 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: The purpose of a black hole.. References: <574C8D12.822@ix.netcom.com> <391741a7-c162-4241-8c70-083a1c3cd83c@googlegroups.com> <574D3C18.6296@ix.netcom.com> <47e82d2e-d033-47cf-a5dd-0bbebf3d9a26@googlegroups.com> <574E2934.116@ix.netcom.com> <197795e3-cb4e-4fee-8418-cf70175869ae@googlegroups.com> <574FD0B5.2228@ix.netcom.com> <943105d7-bfa4-4ee8-b96e-7e076a7a718d@googlegroups.com> <57507EFF.4E36@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 45 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-NXinAmDHSSDHFOJeCjp7as/TCP9GXbRNlG5QgI1BQZBkrMwPrr1m4wznj3on+qiIp2Y3OUVNNBRoq26!pr3agykAaH2DdOzqqBRf29CIFPd9YCpbDoBFZ+Om1i1lCx4Nkxor0C9jMi+KasJMnDSZrSifS715!RRsV8M7mog8= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3119 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:441183 sci.physics:582644 sci.physics.relativity:384922 alt.astronomy:285123 David Waite wrote: > > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:46:07 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > David Waite wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 11:21:33 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 5:15:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > No dumb nut. There is NO "purpose" to anything in nature. Damn you're slow. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are you trying to tell me, that the universe is 'about'...nothing??? You've been watching too many woody allen movies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Wait, Wait David, David Wait, Wait!!! What are you Waiting for? Wait, David, Wait! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > watastupidhandle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WAIT! > > > > > > > > > > Your proposal that its about something is utterly ludicrous. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why may I ask would Stephen Hawking even consider asking the question... > > > > > > Why do you speculate that I would care what questions are attributed to him? > > > > > > So, where did you get this 'idea' may I ask that, "There is NO "purpose" to anything in nature."? > > Any such insane propositions must be rationally rejected without an equally insane quantity of evidence for the propositions. So until you prove your insane proposition, it is rightly rejected in accord with the null hypothesis. That sounds a lot like a 'Philosophy' statement, ....where have you been, haven't you heard, ...that Philosophy is dead? Philosophy is dead!