Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:57:55 -0500
Message-ID: <574F76AE.5558@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:58:38 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: How to be a "real" scientist.
References: <574747ce$0$45348$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> <dqq38iFrud6U1@mid.individual.net> <5747e91f$0$57955$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> <dqss0uFe730U1@mid.individual.net> <qOydnQXMWtOdO9DKnZ2dnUU7_81j4p2d@giganews.com> <dr8pnuFqqtkU1@mid.individual.net> <574F71D8.3B8B@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-tRwwy35pHVaMbNkCOT4/6Op4HUbxoDFrQuTT/DneZA5e+Nu4Sz12iNdT7XgnXNflq28OB3ODEPC9W7L!GaXqxh9svHtH02SBXODdM9nfs+DJY9ix2yDjKZMtnQeLwD4TH7OJAaYDE65y8dbgh/8ygLh1CYcn!APATkGgj0LQ=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3245
X-Received-Bytes: 3357
X-Received-Body-CRC: 938507954
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:441050 sci.physics:582224 sci.physics.relativity:384805 alt.astronomy:285097

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> >
> > Am 31.05.2016 16:56, schrieb Tom Roberts:
> > > On 5/28/16 5/28/16 - 1:26 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >> It is legal to criticise whatever you like in physics (or any other
> > >> science).
> > >> But your critique will not get very far. Especially inside such locked-in
> > >> communities critique will not be heard, since the insiders have no
> > >> interest in
> > >> listening to challenging statements from outside.
> > >
> > > That is not at all how science works. Physics is not a "locked in
> > > community" as you imagine, except insofar as physicists share a common
> > > understanding of basic concepts in the field.
> > >
> > > CRITICISM is acceptable, but IGNORANCE is not. And the latter is all you
> > > have.
> >
> > Well, actually not true. For example there exist 'forbidden subjects',
> > which eventually could bring people in trouble.
> >
> > E.g. I have heard recently, that it is not allowed (in the USA) to
> > question the existence of atomic bombs.
> >
> > I certainly don't plan to do that, but it is interesting, that such a
> > law exists.
> 
> To question the existence of atomic bombs leads to the question..."Who invented the atomic bomb?", and there
> people who don't want you to aks that question...not even THINK of the question.
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> A Starmaker Exclusive
> 
> How many atomic bombs does Israel have? 300, 600, a thousand?
> 
> How many atomic bombs does Iran have?? Or are you not suppose to ask? Or suppose to know??
> 
> What is the name of the person who built the first atomic bomb in Russia?
> 
> Answer:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


Who controls your monopoly owned textbooks?