Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:32:33 -0500
Message-ID: <573C0C95.633E@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 23:32:53 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-Time and Surrealism
References: <nhdppc$isl$1@dont-email.me> <573C07F2.710A@ix.netcom.com> <573C0B1A.5CE3@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 70
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-qNMXXnlDXkEnbVsSVfXJmQj9cakNPjVTAjtHCrBPT4+xkeJgOhxbY5Bg97lIYitO5ZH0JYK/kwnWkHS!VXJ0hy50vuCUxPQ3VP9E6H/LDZHEtvKxoLYZKRnhMkyCDXfYSwsSiDKhKmWjaPmnAhc8MuBNx7qG!zfRNocSkMHo=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3596
X-Received-Bytes: 3708
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2208066062
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:578763 sci.physics.relativity:383676

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > hanson wrote:
> > >
> > > The term "space-time" is idiotic & ill defined.
> > > It has a different meaning and explanation from
> > > author to author, each yelling at the other:
> > > "You must learn" in their hope to cram their own
> > > crap down other folks' throat... ahahahahaha...
> > > >
> > > In the real world there are 1D lengths or lines,
> > > 2D areas or surfaces & 3D volumes or spaces.
> > > But "space-time"?
> > > Is it the product of "Volume x Time"?,
> > > Is it a "Time in the Volume of Space"?
> > > >
> > > Semantics also says that "space" is a DIFFERENCE
> > > or an Interval between 2 points, 2 lines or 2 volumes
> > > or 2 times, which is what the SR/GR Lawyer-language
> > > uses and then leads to space-like, time-like, mass-like
> > > and certainly to _ass-like_ events, -states or -processes,
> > > >
> > > dubbed as Event-horizons, Roche-lobes, Schwartzschild
> > > Radius, Einstein Rings, or Expanding Space, without
> > > saying what it expands into, &/or/not specifying that the
> > > highfaluting expression of "expanding space" merely
> > > means an increase in the interval between 2 observations
> > > or happenings, that have nothing to do with any increase
> > > of 3D Space or Volume of some media.
> > > >
> > > Most of these terms mentioned above do NOT  exist
> > > in the real world, except in the agile minds of Einstein
> > > Dinglesberries in/during their worship of AE's sphincter:
> > > >
> > > AE:  "People like us, who **believe** in physics,
> > > AE:  know that the distinction between the
> > > AE:  past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
> > > AE:  persistent illusion."
> > >
> > > Einstein's language-use in/for SR/GR is akin to the
> > > depiction of Pablo Picasso's bizarre and distorted
> > > schmiers of the human face & form on his canvasses
> > > which is his realism that he called "Surrealism".
> > > >
> > > __ Both are Useless Yiddisher Street Corner Acts.__
> > > __________  aka Judenphysik  __________
> > > >
> >
> > Let me put is simply, but not clear...
> >
> > the past does not exist
> > the future does not exist
> > the present does not exist...
> > that means..
> > spacetime isn't going anywhere.
> >
> > no spacetime
> > no time travel
> > no time dimension.
> >
> 
> In other words...spacetime is just a math idea someone came up with,
> ...nothing to do with nature.
> 



Does space move?