Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-Time and Surrealism
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 23:26:34 -0700
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <573C0B1A.5CE3@ix.netcom.com>
References: <nhdppc$isl$1@dont-email.me> <573C07F2.710A@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1463552785 75980 108.219.229.47 (18 May 2016 06:26:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 06:26:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:578762 sci.physics.relativity:383675

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> hanson wrote:
> >
> > The term "space-time" is idiotic & ill defined.
> > It has a different meaning and explanation from
> > author to author, each yelling at the other:
> > "You must learn" in their hope to cram their own
> > crap down other folks' throat... ahahahahaha...
> > >
> > In the real world there are 1D lengths or lines,
> > 2D areas or surfaces & 3D volumes or spaces.
> > But "space-time"?
> > Is it the product of "Volume x Time"?,
> > Is it a "Time in the Volume of Space"?
> > >
> > Semantics also says that "space" is a DIFFERENCE
> > or an Interval between 2 points, 2 lines or 2 volumes
> > or 2 times, which is what the SR/GR Lawyer-language
> > uses and then leads to space-like, time-like, mass-like
> > and certainly to _ass-like_ events, -states or -processes,
> > >
> > dubbed as Event-horizons, Roche-lobes, Schwartzschild
> > Radius, Einstein Rings, or Expanding Space, without
> > saying what it expands into, &/or/not specifying that the
> > highfaluting expression of "expanding space" merely
> > means an increase in the interval between 2 observations
> > or happenings, that have nothing to do with any increase
> > of 3D Space or Volume of some media.
> > >
> > Most of these terms mentioned above do NOT  exist
> > in the real world, except in the agile minds of Einstein
> > Dinglesberries in/during their worship of AE's sphincter:
> > >
> > AE:  "People like us, who **believe** in physics,
> > AE:  know that the distinction between the
> > AE:  past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
> > AE:  persistent illusion."
> >
> > Einstein's language-use in/for SR/GR is akin to the
> > depiction of Pablo Picasso's bizarre and distorted
> > schmiers of the human face & form on his canvasses
> > which is his realism that he called "Surrealism".
> > >
> > __ Both are Useless Yiddisher Street Corner Acts.__
> > __________  aka Judenphysik  __________
> > >
> 
> Let me put is simply, but not clear...
> 
> the past does not exist
> the future does not exist
> the present does not exist...
> that means..
> spacetime isn't going anywhere.
> 
> no spacetime
> no time travel
> no time dimension.
> 


In other words...spacetime is just a math idea someone came up with,
...nothing to do with nature.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---