Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:31:27 -0600 Message-ID: <568C8A91.5D02@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:31:29 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Is Einstein's Relativity Science? References:

<20151228181331.52cbcdc1b1adf4a24b221fe6@g{oogle}mail.com> <429892e7-9c02-40a3-ab99-51fdadf4eed2@googlegroups.com> <20151229185059.5965e25f3170bc0fbc93b730@g{oogle}mail.com> <7281546d-bf2c-4160-b845-e2375142770e@googlegroups.com> <48a93145-c0d3-4a34-b189-a66427844635@googlegroups.com> <6e48152f-0f97-4861-af41-dedee28cdc06@googlegroups.com> <90ffbe57-c09f-465d-9282-b8d41ea786b0@googlegroups.com>

<87cff83a-25f6-4305-baaf-104517084e48@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 59 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-AseBdxSikYsVZfytt1rNl7S7PIXfzAIS+6EpO7w4yLExVV+7VB1bk/mQD5jq9ZcwQTm9Ac3BexHmEjG!dB2baaaVWevur7XIFMZooDqQKDe1E3yC+a7RfV9uF/6EIHR/4RPpSN4t9m5DEJhzIFew0RRiaS/l!+eK/MdCYNw== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4286 X-Received-Bytes: 4398 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3395141732 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:373384 Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > On 05.01.2016 07:50, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 11:43:46 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > > On 03.01.2016 18:27, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >>> Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >>>> On 03.01.2016 06:39, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/6BxrowPOUPI/7lMdt2zfD > >>>>> > >>>>> that would show the following of Paul's works as "mathemagics". > >>>>> > >>>>> ** https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for confirming that Paul's correct application > >>>> of calculus is mathemagics to Koobee Wublee! > >>> > >>> There is no doubt Paul will try to create more of > >>> its silly "mathemagics" during this upcoming long winter in Norway, > >>> and Koobee Wublee will just identify them as black magic. > >>> Please stay tuned. Bye, Paul. > >> > >> Thanks to Koobee Wublee for identifying calculus as black magic. > > > > Koobee Wublee using the only kind of arguments he know: > > > It looks like Paul is getting very delusional. If anyone reads Koobee Wublee's post above, > > [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/6BxrowPOUPI/7lMdt2zfD] > > there is not connection as to what Paul is referring to. > > Yes, Paul after termination as a professor from Trondheim University has deteriorated mentally, > > intellectually, and personally. Koobee Wublee shall leave Paul alone to chase after these > > imaginary chickens that Paul has claimed to be so fondly of chasing. > > Chasing these imaginary chickens seems to be the only thing that makes Paul very happy. > > Lethal, aren't they? > > I wonder why this correct application of calculus frustrates > Koobee Wublee so much that he has to call it "mathemagics" > and even "black magic": > https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf > > I will accept his claim that calculus is black magic to him, though. That's a little unfair to say since black magic and calculus looks like the same language miost people... http://www.alchemywebsite.com/images/alchemical_processes_symbols.jpg https://eigenblogger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/untitled-1.png?w=620 Didn't the inventor of calculus was a witchcraft blackmagic expert???? yous people don't knows you histoiries... yous better watch it before i drop a house on yous.