Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:32:21 -0600
Message-ID: <56845B83.45D@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:32:35 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Is Einstein's Relativity Science?
References: <fa826916-9070-42d1-9f10-f60ca9318a33@googlegroups.com> <be0dd52e-84e1-4665-bdea-e786248b86df@googlegroups.com> <20151228181331.52cbcdc1b1adf4a24b221fe6@g{oogle}mail.com> <429892e7-9c02-40a3-ab99-51fdadf4eed2@googlegroups.com> <20151229185059.5965e25f3170bc0fbc93b730@g{oogle}mail.com> <7281546d-bf2c-4160-b845-e2375142770e@googlegroups.com> <20151230134827.c7a719254458a7a8f45902bb@g{oogle}mail.com> <56842EEA.2034@ix.netcom.com> <20151231000308.2998e4489f8d47a779b45fd4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5
X-Trace: sv3-eKrczVceql5tBZLirBK6mG9khXI+6/PkZ7C81sVL/UufCQBR1n3L5aSgEXZ7va7E673LHex5/Pvbgb2!nw57KWSFmP8vPeFVjawznNueSRUUCOFupZoZebRmQccmjzUyYSqA+8uIYCKBYVe0LEe0ibuXIzFN!dODihZNj
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2330
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:372955

Anton Shepelev wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker to Anton Shepelev
> on the twins paradox:
> 
> > > You  have  introduced  two  inertial  frames  of
> > > reference,  in  which  case yes, the  clocks  in
> > > each  frame  will  seem to tick slower to an ob-
> > > server in the other frame.  There is no  contra-
> > > diction  in  that  as long as the two clocks are
> > > spatially separated.
> >
> > Okay, one item at a time...
> >
> > When, I repeat...'When' does the clock tick  slow-
> > er?
> 
> You do not seem to know the meaning of 'seem':
> 
>    To  appear, or to appear to be; to have a show or
>    semblance; to present an appearance; to look;  to
>    strike  one's  apprehension or fancy as being; to
>    be taken as.


I saw the word 'seem', I ignored it because I thought it was just a
mistake.