Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:22:13 -0600
Message-ID: <56842EEA.2034@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:22:18 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Is Einstein's Relativity Science?
References: <fa826916-9070-42d1-9f10-f60ca9318a33@googlegroups.com> <be0dd52e-84e1-4665-bdea-e786248b86df@googlegroups.com> <20151228181331.52cbcdc1b1adf4a24b221fe6@g{oogle}mail.com> <429892e7-9c02-40a3-ab99-51fdadf4eed2@googlegroups.com> <20151229185059.5965e25f3170bc0fbc93b730@g{oogle}mail.com> <7281546d-bf2c-4160-b845-e2375142770e@googlegroups.com> <20151230134827.c7a719254458a7a8f45902bb@g{oogle}mail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 78
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5
X-Trace: sv3-YzX74BwxPHM6OhbNjMDXlTtMswcAVQPshwVFf34sGA9FNJd2QAqSZT9VHQtVf+Y1NxULQ091Wh2iOS0!hZuj8rKolvM3z4fjoqMxTnPx3taum45YwiKnsg8YTl95QopfMB91iIC8XKGBv62wO01NSFb1FmCD!Fd2+y98iyQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3712
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:372940

Anton Shepelev wrote:
> 
> Koobee Wublee:
> 
> > Koobee  Wublee  would  like  to  write the Lorentz
> > transform as  the  following  where  the  unprimed
> > frame  is  using coordinate system (t, x, y, z) to
> > describe (thus observe) an event, and at the  same
> > time,  the primed frame is using coordinate system
> > (t', x', dy', dz') to  describe  the  same  event.
> > <shrug>
> >
> > **  c dt' = (c dt - v dx) / sqrt(1 - v^2  / c^2)
> > **  dx' = (dx - v dt) / sqrt(1 - v^2  / c^2)
> > **  dy' = dy
> > **  dz' = dz
> >
> > [...]   Say  the twins are A and B.  When A is ob-
> > serving B,
> >
> > ** dt_AB sqrt(1 - B'^2) = dt_BB
> >
> > Or
> >
> > ** dt_AB = dt_BB / sqrt(1 - B'^2)
> >
> > Where
> >
> > **  A = primed observing the event
> > **  B = unprimed also observing the event which is itself
> > **  dt_AB = time at B as observed by A
> > **  dt_BB = time at B
> >
> > When B is observing A,
> >
> > ** dt_AA = dt_BA sqrt(1 - B^2) = dt_BA sqrt(1 - B'^2)
> >
> > Or
> >
> > ** dt_BA = dt_AA / sqrt(1 - B^2) = dt_AA / sqrt(1 - B'^2)
> >
> > Where
> >
> > **  A = primed also observing the event which is itself
> > **  B = unprimed observing the event
> > **  dt_AA = time at A
> > **  dt_BA = time at A as observed by B
> > **  B^2 = B'^2
> >
> > To sum up, we have
> >
> > ** dt_AB = dt_BB / sqrt(1 - B^2)
> > ** dt_BA = dt_AA / sqrt(1 - B^2)
> >
> > Thus, the contradiction to the Twin paradox is ab-
> > solutely fatal to the religion of relativity.  Af-
> > ter brainstorming wishing for a  divine  interven-
> > tion,  the  Einstein dingleberries had to create a
> > new law of physics that  divinely  apply  only  to
> > non-inertial  frames of reference, but that is to-
> > tal bullshit.  <shrug>
> 
> You have introduced two inertial  frames  of  refer-
> ence,  in  which  case yes, the clocks in each frame
> will seem to tick slower to an observer in the other
> frame.  There is no contradiction in that as long as
> the two clocks are spatially separated.


Okay, one item at a time...

When, I repeat...'When' does the clock tick slower?


For those that don't know the definition of "When"..
https://www.google.com/#q=define+when

So the question is, 'When' does the clock tick slower?