Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:27:03 -0600 Message-ID: <56542D7B.5110@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:27:23 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why is the universe 13.8 milliards years old ? References: <79f68113-11cb-402e-a8cf-b356b92d0248@googlegroups.com> <941310ad-97d2-4bb9-949c-be3d39274634@googlegroups.com> <14634540.10F5PiinAv@PointedEars.de> <5653EFE1.1F85@ix.netcom.com> <5654210A.4A80@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 40 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.49.183.72 X-Trace: sv3-hd2XgWJjypWyZ5/9EEMefjewHRf/sDkx854LAKxGyFhWGj3SdSg27WKYLMPiJmVzBj62yL9mw8GTRPd!ZEa3+RVaS9cwmBGmVdEBidX1g4REN8vpGRqQ9y6IUdZgOyQ0CXQ0x9/DiOFKA1L8h9cokeHknvmx!hcn+5Q+0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3283 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:370778 The Starmaker wrote: > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 9:04:36 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > There seems to be some mistake about what red shift is.. > > > > > > a red shift is not due to expansion or movement.. > > > > > > the red shift is due to a decaying star due to it's age..the red is the > > > first to go. > > > > > > > > > so the further you see the more red shifts you'll find...but not because > > > of expansion.. > > > it's just a fading star. > > > > Are you a complete idiot, or just a partial idiot? You are just making this up as you go along, with your silly ramblings refuted by overwhelming evidence to the contrary. > > > > Why do you bother? Every time you type something on your keyboard you just reveal your ineptitude... > > It's just a Hubble theory...it's based on a theory, it's not correct, it's nonsense. > > 'It appears' to moving away...the stars, the galaxies...it's just older stars and galaxies just fade off it's red first. > > Come back a thousand years and you'll find I'm correct. > > The Starmaker > > and the age of the universe is determined by 'when' you ask the question. > > Ask the question 500 years ago, and you get a different answer. Ask another few hundred years...and you get > a different answer. It's not my fault yous people accept all these theories as...actual facts, which they are not. Get real!