Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:21:14 -0600 Message-ID: <56427BFC.1B05@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:21:32 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why is the universe 13.8 milliards years old ? References: <79f68113-11cb-402e-a8cf-b356b92d0248@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 48 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.49.183.72 X-Trace: sv3-ZJ33MzDsjGgx+m/33uBqAWRyXq64/gqcc2LNzvOzKEAipxKsnMhhKwnsEllDlV79ubPPxkyujeVbalw!fE30pcNTjkfOMMT3JzJEvPKHPMtgI1dOSrNzB8e8jdWQe1iwFF0SiEuN26eXJIxPQgE05exE7ZzK!XhwD3MJ8 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3128 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:369588 HGW wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:28:43 -0800 (PST), Alan Folmsbee > wrote: > > >> > >> Our psychological concept of both Space and Time is based on our > >> experience with their intervals rather than on the dimensions themselves. > >> > >> Spatial intervals have two ends. Time intervals have two ends. We have > >> difficulty in imagining intervals of infinite size. > >> > >> Just as SPACE itself is not a 'spatial interval', TIME itself is not a > >> 'time interval'. > >> > >> Like number, neither Space nor Time have a beginning or an end. The very > >> idea of limits does not apply to them at all. > >> > >> > > >> > Tom Roberts > > > >The beginning and end are swapping time and space, then a new inverted continuum > expands forever. The matter has a purpose: swapping space for time. Space goes > into matter, time comes out. That conserves continuum. > > > >The 13.8 billion year age is only from redshifted galaxies as far as viscosity allows. > It is from a distance measurement. As gravity shrinks space and the the > universe expands, the space is not replenished at the edge because of > viscosity. That lack of replenished space prevents our seeing an infinite >. It > is opaque where viscosity disallows our observations. > > There was no big bang. There are lots of little bangs. Light loses INTRINSIC > energy as it travels and that shows up as redshits. The known universe is like > a turbulent gas with whole galaxies being its 'atoms'. The little bangs are the result of the big bang.. maybe you need pictures: https://media.giphy.com/media/IjmMzurYulKEw/giphy.gif http://bestanimations.com/Holidays/Fireworks/fireworksanimation-13.gif http://its-the-simple-things.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/fireworksAnimation1.gif