Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:32:55 -0500 Message-ID: <55CE5080.4E56@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:33:04 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.math,rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How God Created The Universe References: <55C64615.65AA@ix.netcom.com> <55C70243.626D@ix.netcom.com> <55C84441.34F6@ix.netcom.com> <55C8DD98.646E@ix.netcom.com> <55C941E1.E3F@ix.netcom.com> <55CA6DC5.337@ix.netcom.com> <55CC030E.2781@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 94 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 23.241.144.149 X-Trace: sv3-6tWd417+Jvv3bjrn//zO1/LxBhKxpugtbcinerJIDPi1s4DTFG28J3mEvsGoGjgwC3u0gSk0Xl67aag!M/PTUMBG3C4Lzf3GRCydQFfXHk21W+JWPztvr9ZDsKMeawIxcCxOhnYPeBpUq2lT2HOhqCZglA8s!IRZ4QIfyl6c= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4611 Xref: csiph.com sci.math:313562 rec.arts.sf.written:420185 sci.physics:513676 sci.physics.relativity:360784 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 5:29:01 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Virgil wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In article <55C8DD98.646E@ix.netcom.com>, > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > he Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nothing but nonsense! Time after time! > > > > > > > > > > > > Which part is nonsense? > > > > > > > > A circle > > > > should be > > > > 365 degrees. > > > > > > > > You guys say > > > > 360 degrees... > > > > > > > > Where did yous guys come up with the 360 number??? > > > > > > Ya know, you could research this stuff yourself, it is just not that difficult a task. Here, for example... > > > > > > http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/59075.html > > > > you get your information form a Math Forum???? > > There is no mention ...about Time. > > > > Why is this answer different? > > > > It's about time, but the wrong time... > > > > http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/340467/why-is-a-full-circle-360%C2%B0-degrees > > > > Now, I need to straighten this world of yours again... > > > > There are 365 days in a year... > > > > Time runs in a circle... > > > > that means, a circle degrees is 365. > > > > Why am I right and everyone else in the world got it wrong??? > > "The Sumerians watched the Sun, Moon, and the five visible planets > (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn), primarily for omens. They > did not try to understand the motions physically. They did, however, > notice the circular track of the Sun's annual path across the sky and > knew that it took about 360 days to complete one year's circuit. > Consequently, they divided the circular path into 360 degrees to track > each day's passage of the Sun's whole journey. This probably happened > about 2400 BC. > > That's how we got a 360 degree circle. Around 1500 BC, Egyptians > divided the day into 24 hours, though the hours varied with the seasons > originally. Greek astronomers made the hours equal. About 300 to 100 BC, > the Babylonians subdivided the hour into base-60 fractions: 60 minutes > in an hour and 60 seconds in a minute. The base 60 of their number > system lives on in our time and angle divisions. > > An 100-degree circle makes sense for base 10 people like ourselves. > But the base-60 Babylonians came up with 360 degrees and we cling to > their ways-4,400 years later." > > Oh, I get it...you math people "cling to their ways-4,400 years > later".... > > even though there are 365days in a year. > > Do you think you math guys can...improve on it by ...now? Or is that too > much to hope for? > > It's going to take another 4,400 years for yous to catch up with me.... > > The tools used today by the 'sci community' is a little behind the > times... > you're...limiting yourselves. > > Let me take you to the other side of the universe... So, now you know Time flows in a circle... not a perfect circle...but a circle..a little 5 degree difference.