Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:34:09 -0500 Message-ID: <55A54810.3BA5@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:34:08 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Near True References: <55871A72.769A@ix.netcom.com> <55A0825A.1973@ix.netcom.com> <55A082C3.2BF9@ix.netcom.com> <55A34275.701F@ix.netcom.com> <55A4415A.78A4@ix.netcom.com> <55A4A291.7D61@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 98 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 23.241.144.149 X-Trace: sv3-x2r+UqJ+AIE+M+OWj6f/6yf8mmSU2/JFdG515VYngIP7U/zzwD199USHEfmUP+msg9ih5nUdBdQy55S!8nMD6rOxf5ciATFgU/KkcNCS/1/+AXecZUpF341BB+zibm0PzqJViBIfkUEtzXlsuKtZvKGNZSFj!dEyDse9cPKs= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4873 Xref: aioe.org alt.astronomy:270941 sci.physics:507025 sci.physics.relativity:357097 Simoen wrote: > > On 7/14/2015 12:48 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker writes: > >> > >>> Michael Moroney wrote: > >>>> > >>>> How NASA uses the term: > >>>> > >>>> http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question20.html > >>>> > >>>> Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_color > >> > >>> Okay, yours user-edited website reads: > >> > >>> A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that > >>> differ from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show. > >> > >> That's all you need to know. > >> > >> Think of an old-time color photograph negative. That's a false color > >> image, but one from which a true color image can be recreated. > >> A black-and-white photograph is also false color. > >> > >> Sometimes false color is the only way to do it. Like a photo in the > >> infrared or ultraviolet. You *must* use false color for that, what would > >> a true-color infrared photograph look like? > >> > >> IR and UV can show details not visible in visible light. Ever see a photo > >> of flowers in the ultraviolet, the way a bee would see it? Can't do it > >> without false color. I have a false color aerial photograph of where I > >> live from 20 years ago. It's in infrared and visible light. Infrared is > >> shown as red. Healthy vegetation (farm fields, golf courses etc.) show up > >> as bright red as healthy vegetation reflects IR very well. Not so healthy > >> vegetation as dull red or pinkish. It shows the health in much more > >> detail than just looking at it, as both look green. > >> > >>> I don't see any difference....it's still 'meant to deceive, incorrect, > >>> not according with truth or fact.' > >> > >> How can it be meant to deceive if they explicitly say it's false color? > >> Esp. when they explicitly give color mapping, like my USGS false color > >> photograph? It says that infrared appears as red, red as green and green > >> as blue, as well as giving the actual wavelengths. > > > > I think you got lost somewhere... > > > > The Subject heading of this threads reads? "Near True". > > > > then I posted NASA article: > > > > NASA publishes 1st 'near-true color' images of Pluto > > http://rt.com/usa/268678-nasa-first-pluto-images/ > > > > > > They didn't write false colors... > > if they are not TRUE COLORS, they are FALSE COLORS. Simple. > > > > > somebody came into my thread and added "false colors" which was never mentioned in the news... > > "near-true" is "not true", which means it is "false". > > and "someone" had to correct your faulty thinking, > which may be "near-true", but "not true", so "faulty thinking" it is. > > > > > > > "false colors" was not mentioned in the news... > > > > > > What was mentioned was 'near-true color' and simulated true-colour ....but no mentioned of the words "false colors". > > > > > > Tell your News Science People that I said to put in the Headline "false colors", instead of > > 'near-true color' and "simulated true-colour", okay? > > absolutly, I will get right on it, but they will ask, How False? > then what? > > > > > > > Because everybody knows what "false" means. > > false is near-true. > > > > > > > So the average person can say..."Oh, it's fuckin fake color photos!" > > > > the color on your computer screen is false too. it's near true.