Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The real time stretching in effect refutes the special relativity
Supersedes: <740421604.0ifERbkFSE@PointedEars.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:44:01 +0100
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <1874459.OBFZWjSADL@PointedEars.de>
References: <872b50e2-80c6-4846-afbe-2a87f4c9e5e6@googlegroups.com> <b2464ce3-7f13-4eaa-b0eb-ea15a5d3a2e7@googlegroups.com> <mcednUywAe96F6LFnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <c4564ee6-ec6e-4da2-87b0-2bece74c6c96@googlegroups.com> <o1pg5n$j86$1@gioia.aioe.org> <faa4b622-7170-431d-92f8-be650123ce29@googlegroups.com> <o1pvd0$1fof$1@gioia.aioe.org> <3095423.iIbC2pHGDl@PointedEars.de> <0f32a2d2-d510-4485-980a-a8f6c3704de5@googlegroups.com> <98742847.nniJfEyVGO@PointedEars.de> <e4a8792d-e1dc-4e59-acc7-b9b417dadf61@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.227.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: gwaiyur.mb-net.net 1480797842 14664 178.197.227.173 (3 Dec 2016 20:44:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@open-news-network.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 20:44:02 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: 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
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:400722

worlov@yandex.ru wrote:

> [gibberish] The right answer is: 29 times faster!

Given that I already referred you to the right answer,
which differs from what you claim here:

How did you get that idea?

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.