Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity in no trouble at all Followup-To: alt.1d Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:22:20 +0100 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 54 Message-ID: <1620548.TPb4ECtSdM@PointedEars.de> References: <4467213.30Msqfnnay@PointedEars.de> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: solani.org 1446070942 4742 eJwNycEBwCAIA8CVKiSI44DA/iPY+x7Vlt0No4HD0Y06YIUnP3rOUtNwenTJfyJT6Dq8QmTnAxQ4ETo= (28 Oct 2015 22:22:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:22:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2 X-User-ID: eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVQEii41TE/Ueon3sdgs5SEkxcXOrQYC36aTxnq6eXpd8Vs/qt4d+oisxAL0Jprq3U2VU/L8AUsA== Cancel-Lock: sha1:TCaLRmYt91E+noG8r7hrwipdFrY= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwYkRACEIBLCWwH2Qcu506L8EE8HpU7RMjYby9vTqbEbh61tOgActBDGh/XsNBhkX8QDsTg9Z Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:368414 The ’nym-shifting troll posted as “Willie Stovall”: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Günther Huldiberaht wrote: >>> Unlike Divergent Matter, Relativity does not work at large scale, in >>> Cosmology, […] >> The usual “not even wrong”-kind of nonsense from the ’nym-shifting troll. >> >> General relativity (GR) works *especially* at large scales, *especially* >> in cosmology. > > You know so many things monsiour PointedEars. (That would be “monsieur”. Please stop using languages that you do not know.) Yes, I do. But if you would take the time to learn instead of to assume and to lie repeatedly, you could as well. > You use large fonts. You cannot know the font size that I use. This is a text-only medium. Probably your well-known abysmally low understanding of English has caused you to post such a nonsensical sentence. > Are you aware that the predictions of relativity, in that domain, are 96% > off range, They are not. > the reason for which fictitious additive were introduced, for the > moment known as dark matter and dark energy. You may call them what you > want, bottom line is that those 96% are missing from the aforementioned > relativity predictions. Not even wrong. > Günther is consistent. You are Günther. > What is your excuse? I do not need an excuse. I am not the habitual liar here; you are. *PLONK* PointedEars -- Q: Why is electricity so dangerous? A: It doesn't conduct itself. (from: WolframAlpha)