Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math Subject: Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 05:33:42 +0200 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <10qhdbr$3mfl8$1@dont-email.me> <114ku54$3pu7t$1@news.nntp4.net> <114pvvg$2e49$1@news.nntp4.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net CJPqo/4d1SEMK5CxQ6iG3wceLfHDWysBjK3z3DmdjwqXjelvwT Cancel-Lock: sha1:LxOPbrr8BgOWMnOd+005+qOItJw= sha256:UWHrdRfReAXjIaBVANrrjnNNRvEuarVq2phxCCI/1F4= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE, en-US In-Reply-To: <114pvvg$2e49$1@news.nntp4.net> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671847 sci.math:647158 Am Montag000003, 03.08.2026 um 14:01 schrieb Brooks Mikhaltsov: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> I compare spacetime diagrams with Argand diagrams and find similarities. >> >> That's why I thought, that spacetime of GR is real and has complex >> valued components. > > The z-plane is a discrete-time version of the s-plane, where z-transforms > are used instead of the Laplace transformation. That's true. But I wanted to start at the GR side and proceed from there to the QM-side. Actually my aim was to build particles out of spacetime (of GR), hence assume the real existence of something like the z-plane (which I simply called 'complex plane'), but 'in volume'. Then the axis of time is local and in a cone around it we find what we call 'space' and perpendicular as an inverse to time the hyperplane of the present. The combination of a static field, which is timeless, hence belongs to the hyperplane of the present, and the axis of time gives an atom, because mass is timelike. This 'atom' is 'relativistic', because it depends on the local axis of time what we call 'atom'. This 'z-plane in volume' could be achieved, if we take a complex plane and 'multiply it by three' as three perpendicular complex planes. Then we combine it with a 'perpendicular' imaginary axis of time and need something like a 'bi-quaternion field', This is quite abstract, sure, but I had written kind of book about this concept called 'structured spacetime' many years ago: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing This concept behaves imho quite well and is astonishingly simple. But it is only sooooo different to anything you ever heard of, that hardly anybody understands it. TH