Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The mathematical constraints of set theory Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:36:26 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <87sfasptrp.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <885f11ce-f96b-4c21-8aa3-98bdb0cf867bn@googlegroups.com> <9a1ab6c8-b72e-48ed-9989-5dde54cb04efn@googlegroups.com> <87wn06qcwg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <1422f0f8-d2bc-4c86-a8b8-27c033b77bfan@googlegroups.com> <87r0qdrblf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <3ff20b7b-9b0c-4af3-b57a-f27b1c804a15n@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01ade3a3210c6e7beeaaf59b22ec953d"; logging-data="498117"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/c7I56+FHl8AjennS3PLK1K4NO/5LvpEU=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/UHFm0Et2U2MqqiftQaoIFnstcI= sha1:kH5XEPRbFA3BOHskIXCEO3m8wxE= X-BSB-Auth: 1.20b583552b45e69cfa2d.20230615173626BST.87sfasptrp.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: csiph.com sci.math:602341 Timothy Golden writes: > On Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> I did not find anything resembling a definition of "productive set" in >> what you wrote. The term did not even appear in your reply. >> >> Would it not have been simpler to have said something like "sorry, I did >> not mean productive set" or "I've not yet decided what I mean by those >> words" or even "I don't want to say what I mean just yet"? > > Apologies, Ben. I meant 'productive' as in ordinary English language. Ah. OK. I won't ask how that meaning could apply to a set because I don't suppose you need me to understand you. > Is your point really just a dodge anyways? I like to know what people mean when they write things, but I don't think you always like people to know what you mean, at least not without a lot of chat first. -- Ben.