Path: csiph.com!.POSTED.csiph.com!not-for-mail From: "HenHanna" Newsgroups: alt.anagrams,rec.puzzles,sci.lang,alt.usage.english Subject: (A short Clip on) -- Why Punctuation is important --- [Eats, Shoots & Leaves] Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 02:36:11 +0000 Organization: csiph.com Internet News Service Message-ID: <6a1e419b.26454027ebc8a3be@csiph.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: csiph.com; posting-host="csiph.com:127.0.0.1"; logging-data="83151"; mail-complaints-to="admin@kev009.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:lo5CYIcfNnOVjwumlg2qHKa8O3o= sha256:fZeXzST0bybOineW4f/CQy3j6a0M2dx18A2IPW4922g= X-Posted-By: csiph-web (user: HenHanna) Xref: csiph.com alt.anagrams:13796 rec.puzzles:27899 sci.lang:308524 alt.usage.english:1145007 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho0NtIR5-_U >>> I watched this 10 times and it’s still funny 🤣 - YouTube ___________________ btw... I checked out that book [Eats, Shoots, and Leaves] some years ago, and thought it was lame or below-average. >>> That is a very common reaction to it. While it was a massive bestseller, [Eats, Shoots & Leaves] faced heavy criticism from linguists and readers who found it pretentious, overly rigid, and ironic. I thought the writing was lame--- It didn't have the wit or concision of Strunk (and White). >>> That makes perfect sense, and you hit on exactly why so many people find Truss's book frustrating. Comparing Eats, Shoots & Leaves to Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style highlights a massive gap in quality and philosophy. Why Strunk and White Succeeds (and Truss Fails)...........