Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: phoenix Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,talk.politics.guns,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,alt.slack Subject: Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 18:14:33 -0600 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <6a16194b$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6a166d97$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6a171396$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net D+DAAC6LqdBrcOj1Z4a9DATsSA9P/fQb0/fARuHWwEjNNgVjK+ Cancel-Lock: sha1:pXqY76mrdGYudvl46fRLodVJqt0= sha256:LTQ+dwAQTHn/2TaDjz2WmhyCEsCqtMzXK0lK+IPXivg= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.23 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3039296 or.politics:539238 talk.politics.guns:1783364 sci.environment:101853 alt.global-warming:780769 alt.slack:510171 Samuel Spade wrote: > zendejo wrote: >> On 5/26/26 10:05 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote: >>> Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air >>> and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific >>> evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like >> >> Like THIS: >> >> https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money > > You knew, of course, the Heritage Foundation is a political > and religious advocacy organization. It is not at all a > source for science or technology. Among other things, > Heritage Foundation created the Project 2025 document, an > outline for dismantling democracy in the USA. > > >> How big is the Climate Change Industrial Complex today? Surprisingly, no >> one seems to be keeping track of all the channels of funding. A few >> years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated >> about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy >> subsidies during President Obama’s first term. >> >> That didn’t include the tax subsidies that provide a 30 percent tax >> credit for wind and solar power — so add to those numbers about $8 >> billion to $10 billion a year. Then add billions more in costs >> attributable to the 29 states with renewable energy mandates that >> require utilities to buy expensive “green” energy. > > You also know, or you should know, that solar electric is > generally cheaper to install and operate than any fossil > fueled power source. Straight up, without subsidy. > > Shouldn't you be asking why we are compelled to subsidize > fossil fuel? No that's ridiculous. He's a conservative. No way would he ask that. Fossil fuels or bust, he says because he's from the same mold as Skeeter and CrudeSausage. They will all say, burn fuel, petroline and jet fuel. They will tell you say no to solar power. It's bad, they have to say. -- War in the east War in the west War up north War down south War War