Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From: Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Can we PLEASE stop using these shitty symbols?
Date: 28 May 2017 14:30:53 -0700
Organization: Rowland Institute
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <ogffid0ec1@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <ng5eic12cs7ucsq5jq569odd9cp0dsoq17@4ax.com> <og76a8$1o61$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f3c21660-1ce9-4c0d-8509-010397e4e5c3@googlegroups.com> <ogebcr0196g@drn.newsguy.com> <a01ff797-fe6e-42ab-98c3-c8bbbdce26bb@googlegroups.com> <5mulic1f4t850kidbf094q27ijtul80drg@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p1abeddf2571d46730872df12db1cba54e95ecce4e162c4be.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes: 1175
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3939009984
Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:462126

John Larkin wrote...
>
> It would be best to include every mosfet property ...
> enhancement or depletion properties. ...

 Now there's an issue, sometimes it's not obvious
 which kind of part a designer has chosen, and I've
 been forced to look up the listed part just to find
 out.  Quick, is a BSS126 enhancement or depletion?
 How about a BSS138 or a BSS159?


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win