Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Kuenz Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: big drives Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:01:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Distribution: world Message-ID: <20170323c@crcomp.net> References: <20170322a@crcomp.net> <20170322b@crcomp.net> <20170323a@crcomp.net> <3uv7dclii8s6nkmqrpi3kvdboshgv1biv3@4ax.com> <20170323b@crcomp.net> <35s8dc1huf6dvav4hn5jbu1hppkmro5pfq@4ax.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:01:32 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="68b1a7298eb3383b635415c2ae0dbcba"; logging-data="22881"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+o1pPeZSk9ontH4p370df9" Cancel-Lock: sha1:lbvjDI7uqmQEJrMpdu6BNA8Fssc= Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:453327 >>SSD deployments into non-mission critical applications are actually >>quite old school to me at this juncture. Regardless it's still best >>for me to "lead from behind" and let other people bet their own >>mission critical farms first. :0) > > What's "mission critical" about a cycle server? Add another. My server farms, plural, each contain multiple servers. There's at most one cycle server in the mix. That particular cycle server is not mission critical. The remaining servers of interest host mission critical applications for unaffiliated enterprises. It's just like the name says, when a mission critical server fails the enterprise fails. That's why it's best for me to "lead from behind" and let other people bet their own mission critical farms first. :0) Thank you, -- Don Kuenz KB7RPU