Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Kuenz Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: big drives Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Distribution: world Message-ID: <20170323a@crcomp.net> References: <20170322a@crcomp.net> <20170322b@crcomp.net> Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7e5f3e7da20ef269af6337ab0dde1489"; logging-data="31383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WmGUoKTr+69KpuyPBtYU6" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xv5fxMPZ2FSABXswTfEyTgP9cC4= Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:453235 David Brown wrote: > Hard disks are not outdated technology, nor are 3.5" disks. But > super-fast hard disks /are/ outdated - there is no point in them. SSDs > are smaller, faster, cheaper, lower power, and more reliable - they win > on every count. Your entire multi-disk raid could be replaced by a > couple of big SSDs in RAID1 (or perhaps Linux RAID10) setup for a faster > system taking less space and using a fraction of the power and noise. > (Again, I fully understand that replacement is not necessarily a cheap > or easy process - I am giving you the manufacturers' viewpoint here.) > > Hard disks make sense when you want cheap GB's. SSDs make sense when > you want speed. So new hard disks these days are typically 5400 or > maybe 7200 rpm - 10K and 15K spinning rust is a thing of the past. Technical glitches such as the Seagate plague make me hesitant to bet my farms on SSD. Other people can bet *their* farms first and we'll see what happens. At this present point in time it's best for me to "lead from behind" just like a science fictional hindmost puppeteer. :0) Thank you, -- Don Kuenz KB7RPU