Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Message-ID: References: <0a34uj9pf5r7f4kneahsc4v6qgfq1684mi@4ax.com> <7j64uj172e6b9tat3v1n7gla57mml2ag0j@4ax.com> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OS: Debian 12, with Wine 10.0 for WinAPI Lines: 50 X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 00:08:02 UTC Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 20:08:02 -0400 X-Received-Bytes: 2497 Xref: csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:194088 comp.os.linux.advocacy:688648 Alan wrote: >>>> https://i.imgur.com/bNZVr8U.png >>> >>> You've just shown that you DO NOT need 32GB of RAM... >>> >>> (and that Linux isn't smart enough to count RAM in base-2). >> >> https://i.imgur.com/4jItMI0.png >> >> As you can see, today, I have puked out a little into swap. > >Dude: give it up. > >You've got 33.5 decimal gigabytes of RAM. > >19.2GB is in use with the other 14.3GB used for cache. > >And 3.7MB... > >...one HUNDREDTH of one percent of it... > >...is swapped out... > >...and you think that's a solid argument? > >Linux has 14.3GB used for caching and for some reason chooses to swap a >tiny, TINY fraction of data rather than use a little less for cache... > >...and you think you're proving something good? So let me get this straight, your argument is that cache isn't actually needed? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.